As Shakespeare once wrote, “What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet.” For “Romeo and Juliet” that one short line puts in a nutshell the central struggle and tragedy of the play. The central struggle for NASCAR these days seems to be the decline of fan loyalty and interest in the sport of stock car racing.
Fan loyalty being what it is these days in NASCAR; it is hard to pinpoint exactly where the decline began in recent times. Some like to point at the change in leadership, which brought about not only a new point scoring format but a new car as well, while others think that the constant changing of rules has taken the fun out of the sport. Still another group might say that the drivers of today are nothing like the hard-chargers of yesteryear.
In my personal opinion, I think there might be another reason: the loss of racetrack identity. Fans are being driven away because they can’t associate a favorite race with any particular track anymore.
Corporate sponsorship is a very good thing for the sport of racing. Not only does it ease the financial burden of car ownership but it makes for fun competition to see a car with one product brand dueling with another car with a different product brand down the backstretch and the fans of both cars displaying said brands on t-shirts, hats, etc. good-naturedly jeering at one another as their favorite cars cross the finish line. Who cares if it looks like one big commercial on television? The fans will gladly buy the product on Monday whether their driver wins or lose just because they like the driver and want to support the team. Even the commercials themselves, lately, have been fun to watch with the drivers hawking products in some of the funniest ways possible.
In the modern era of NASCAR, the sport survived with the great support received from the RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company after the major car manufacturers pulled their support from the sport in 1971. When the races were televised more frequently beginning with the infamous 1979 Daytona 500 race, the majority of the fans hereafter associated the sport with Winston Cup instead of what was previously known as NASCAR Grand National. Even today, the overall corporate sponsorship with Sprint has some good potential with cars “sprinting” down the backstretch to the finish line.
However, part of the fun of attending a race has always been the racetrack itself. Whether attendance is filled due to the locals or by fans from out of town, the racetrack’s identity was always a part of the marketing appeal. This weekend’s race in Atlanta is a prime example. When the track first opened in 1960, the races were called either the Dixie 400 (500 later) or the Atlanta 500 for 20 years! It didn’t matter that the Dixie races didn’t have the name Atlanta in the race name but most fans at the time knew where the track was if the race was the Dixie 500 back then.
Beginning in 1980, corporate sponsorship started to creep in to steal the racetrack’s identity. The spring races in Atlanta became known as the Coca-Cola 500 and the fall races were the Atlanta Journal 500. For the short term at least the sponsorship was local so the racetrack’s identity wasn’t completely stolen. But, we know what has since become of the Coca-Cola 500, it wound up in Charlotte.
It got worse as the 80’s progressed. The Coca-Cola 500 gave way to the Motorcraft 500, the Atlanta Journal 500 turned into the Hooters 500. Eventually, the names got longer in each successive year until at one point the fall race was known as the Bass Pro Shops MBNA 500. Two sponsors on one bill!
If you weren’t from around Atlanta or a really big fan, you might not have known where those races were being held because of the name. This weekend’s race is the Kobalt Tools 500. I never even heard of Kobalt Tools until the Lowes home improvement stores started pushing them in recent years.
Atlanta is not the only racetrack that has suffered from this form of identity loss. Daytona of course has the Daytona 500 opener or had the Firecracker 400 in July. Darlington had really great races under the Rebel 500 or the Southern 500 names. Unfortunately, Darlington not only lost the race names, it lost one whole race in the fall. But, that’s another story. There was the Winston 500 in Talladega, the World 600 in Charlotte, the Old Dominion 500 in Martinsville, and so on. It didn’t matter which year you were talking about but if you knew those race names, then most likely you knew what track the race was being held at.
Today, there are a few race names where the track is still readily identifiable. Races such as the Daytona 500, the Dover 400, the Pocono 500, and the Michigan 400. With the exception of the Daytona 500, all the other race names above sound boring. Kansas 400, blah.
Can you identify the race tracks where the following races will be held?
- The Amp Energy 500
- NASCAR Sprint Cup Series 500
- Coke Zero 400 Powered by Coca-Cola
Or the always favorite
- Crown Royal Presents “Your Name Here” 400
Good race names but I can pretty much bet that all of those race names will not be used again next year, much less 20 years down the road like the Dixie 500!
(Answers to above in order: Talladega Oct 5th, Martinsville Oct 19th, Daytona July 5th, and Richmond May 3rd.)

Chris DeSpain is a contributing editor at
RubbingsRacing.com